![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Author | Topic: Gamma flux work speed |
DanTucny Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() I will be putting up a page on my site with a compilation of speeds for various CPUs/systems, so if you would like to post your details here... ------------------ IP: Logged |
Grego Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() k6 3-450 with 128 mb pc100 ram with win98. Normal speed 8500 rays/sec, one block takes about 10 minutes to complete. hope this was useful Grego IP: Logged |
Arcane Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() PIII/550, 128 Megs RAM, Win 2000 10000 rays/sec IP: Logged |
Arcane Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() P166, 40 Megs RAM, Win98 2600 rays/sec IP: Logged |
Slapyo Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() PII 450Mhz 128MB 100Mhz RAM 8900 Rays/s PII 400Mhz 32MB 100Mhz RAM ------------------ IP: Logged |
Slapyo Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() PII 450Mhz 128MB 100Mhz RAM 8900 Rays/s PII 400Mhz 32MB 100Mhz RAM ------------------ IP: Logged |
DanTucny Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() Ok, the page is at http://www.tucny.com/dnetspeeds / ------------------ IP: Logged |
Maciek Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() Celeron 300A@463Mhz, Abit BH6, 64MB 100Mhz RAM, W98SE, GF 1.02 - 9073 rays/s. [This message has been edited by Maciek (edited January 17, 2000).] IP: Logged |
LeBlatt Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() Celeron 541, win98SE, 64 MB : 10.000 R/s AMD K6-2 475, win2k RC2, 128 MB : 7.800 R/s [This message has been edited by LeBlatt (edited January 17, 2000).] IP: Logged |
Armin High Priest of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() Celeron 453 8400 rays/s Athlon 850 20600 rays/s SMP Celeron 550 20000 rays/s IP: Logged |
Cruelty Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() Pee II 350MHz ~6400 rays/sec Celeron 366@550 ~10800 rays/sec IP: Logged |
Slapyo Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() Ohh yeah, I have 2 450's running that speed, and the 1 400....they are all on Win98 ------------------ IP: Logged |
Troodon Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() In Win98: K6-2 400AFQ@472 - 9000 rays/s IP: Logged |
Matze Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() K6-2 350 / Win98: ~6600 rays/s K6 200 / Win98: ~3100 rays/s IP: Logged |
Postmand_Per Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() K6-III 450MHz, 128MB RAM: 8500rays/s (Win2000) Pentium 75, 16MB RAM: 1150rays/s <-- it might do around 1300rays/s on a good day ![]() ------------------ IP: Logged |
Peldor Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() Celeron 450 8900 rays/sec IP: Logged |
Ken_g6 Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() Okay, I've added the info DanTucny wants: PII-400 64MB 100MHz SDRAM Win98 Cyrix 6x86 PR150+@120MHz 32MB 60MHz SDRAM 486?/120MHz about 860 Rays/s Win95 GF 1.02 without ramdisk The last is a new assimilation (can I say that here? Ken [This message has been edited by Ken_g6 (edited January 17, 2000).] IP: Logged |
briant Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() I suggest running TheMagicman's TheLogParser for a day and posting the average rays. I just switched to Gamma today, so I'll have some averages tomorrow. =) One thing that's odd from these posts is K6 systems scoring higher than Celerons of the same/similar speed. I was under the impression that Gamma is a FPU intensive task. If that's true, this should be the order: Athlon->P3->Celeron->P2->K6->P5. Perhaps the CPU detection isn't working properly. IP: Logged |
Zypher Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() Athlon 800 256/Win 98 and Win2k No idea version 'about' says bolt on gui version 1.01...it runs flux by default though, so it has to be pretty new Gets ~19000 for both...highest I've seen is 19812, lowest'idle' is ~13000 but only maybe one in 20 blocks is that slow, at least 90% are 19000 or above when idle. IP: Logged |
Arcane Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() (for the extra info on your web page) Both of my computers are running gflux 1.02 IP: Logged |
Armin High Priest of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() Zypher you may upgrade to the 1.02 GF client, it runs a nice tick faster ![]() IP: Logged |
Osiris Priest of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() Zypher: When running Gamma Flux, the title bar of the GUI will tell you the version. The about box tells you about the gui. The title bar tell you about the core. Steve IP: Logged |
Zypher Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() Duuh /smacks head/ it was right in front of me the whole time! 1.02 on titlebar, so 1.01 must be for GUI not client. IP: Logged |
Zypher Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() Perhaps you should put something like this on your webpage...
I wish this board had a preview button, don't mind me if it looks screwed up IP: Logged |
Zypher Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() Oops, doesn't like anything that looks like script...anyway, you get the idea ![]() IP: Logged |
LeBlatt Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() Osiris : The latest client I DLed says 1.03 at startup, but writes 1.02 in status file It differs (Hex compare) a lot from the previous 1.02 I had ------------------ IP: Logged |
briant Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() Ok, I got some 1 day average Rays for ya. Pentium 233MMX, 128MB, Win98SE: 4.01 KRay/sec Celeron 366@458Mhz, 128MB, Win98SE: 9.00 KRay/sec Pentium 3 500E@666Mhz, 128MB, Win98SE: 12.86 KRay/sec Dual Celeron 366@456Mhz, 96MB, NT4sp6: 15.87 KRay/sec Dual Celeron 366@550Mhz, 96MB, NT4sp6: 21.31 KRay/sec None using RAMDisks or anything. Working on some dual Xeon 550 stats assuming I can get my hands on the keyboards(yes, 2 duals!!!, and NO, I will not be adding them to my personal collection like the others I listed). =) IP: Logged |
fredro Priest of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() i tried this on a few machines tonight. here goes: k6-2 448mhz 7667.35 rays/s 128mb celeron 550 10703.53 rays/s 128mb celeron 433 8334.86 rays/s 64mb cyrix pr200 2250.36 rays/s 96mb intel 150 2445.57 rays/s 96mb all machines running win98se athlon 650@700 21300 rays/s 128mb [This message has been edited by fredro (edited February 16, 2000).] IP: Logged |
Cruelty Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() I forgot to mention my OS and GF version, here they are again: Pee II 350MHz ~6400 rays/sec WIN95 OSR2.1 / GF 1.03 Pee II 350MHz ~6600 rays/sec WIN95 OSR2.1 / GF 1.01 Celeron 366@550 ~10800 rays/sec WIN98 / GF 1.03 Pee II 266MHz ~5000 rays/sec WIN NT 4.0 SP5 / GF 1.01 That would be all... IP: Logged |
Troodon Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() Pentium 200@100 GF 1.02 Win32 - 1600 rays/s IP: Logged |
Other, Esq. Wish I had an Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() P200 with mmx @ 3433 rays/sec IP: Logged |
Other, Esq. Wish I had an Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() P200 with mmx @3433 rays/sec. on Win95 SR2 IP: Logged |
adam04 Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() NT4 SPK 5 GF 1.02 Dual Celeron 500Mhz 9100 R/sec per cpu When overclocked @ 563Mhz 10100 R/sec (fastest boot frequency) @ 600Mhz 11900 R/sec (have to change FSB from within windows) @ 615Mhz 12200 R/sec (but only for about 15 mins before blue screen of death) AMD K6 II 380Mhz laptop 32Mb Win 98 GF 1.02 3100 R/sec (runs on ram disk) AMD K6 II 350Mhz 100MB Win 98 GF 1.02 6500 R/sec (runs on ram disk) AMD K6 200Mhz 64MB Win 98 GF 1.02 2700 R/sec Toshiba Satellite P120 40MB Win 98 GF 1.02 1700 R/sec Tosh Satellite P100 24 MB Win 95 GF 1.02 1600 R/sec I'm about to try an ancient Texas laptop 486 DX4 75 Mhz with Win 95! IP: Logged |
Maciek Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() I wonder who runs the slowest system with GF client??? ![]() ![]() IP: Logged |
Postmand_Per Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() Athlon 600 does 17000 rays/s ------------------ IP: Logged |
Troodon Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() K6-2 400 AFQ@525MHz Win98 GF 1.02 - 9900 rays/s IP: Logged |
the_dcypher Wish I had an Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() On my pentium 90 MHz ~ 1400 rays/s and on a AMD K6 400 MHz ~ 7500 rays/s. my friend gets ~ 10000 rays/s on a P3 500 MHz. IP: Logged |
Troodon Follower of Athlon |
![]() ![]() ![]() Celeron 400@600 MHz, GF 1.04, Win98 - 13000 rays/s IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
All submissions are copyrighted by their respective authors and are not for re-use in any form without their explicit written consent.
Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.37
© Madrona Park, Inc., 1998 - 1999.
Membaca review slot online bisa menjadi panduan yang sangat berguna. Review sering kali memberikan informasi tentang RTP slot tertinggi dan pengalaman pemain sebelumnya. Dengan memilih slot gacor yang telah direkomendasikan, peluang untuk menang dapat meningkat. Jadi, jangan lewatkan untuk memeriksa ulasan sebelum mulai bermain.
Beberapa situs kini menawarkan Slot Depo 5k sebagai pilihan deposit yang sedikit lebih tinggi, memberikan lebih banyak variasi dalam permainan dan peluang kemenangan. Meskipun sedikit lebih besar, modal ini tetap cukup terjangkau bagi banyak pemain.
Jika Anda menyukai permainan yang menggabungkan strategi dengan keberuntungan, Slot Mahjong adalah pilihan yang tepat. Permainan ini menggabungkan elemen-elemen dari permainan Mahjong klasik dengan fitur-fitur permainan slot yang menguntungkan. Setiap putaran dalam Slot Mahjong memberikan pengalaman yang berbeda, dengan berbagai peluang untuk mendapatkan kemenangan besar berkat simbol-simbol unik yang tersedia.
Menemukan platform yang tepat sangat penting bagi pemain yang ingin mendapatkan keuntungan lebih dalam bermain. Salah satu yang paling sering dicari adalah Link Slot Gacor yang memberikan akses langsung ke berbagai permainan dengan peluang menang lebih tinggi. Dengan dukungan teknologi canggih, pemain bisa menikmati pengalaman bermain yang lebih nyaman dan menguntungkan setiap saat.
Untuk menikmati permainan togel dengan hadiah besar, penting memilih platform yang aman dan terpercaya. Salah satu rekomendasi terbaik adalah Situs Togel 2d, tempat yang ideal untuk pemain yang menginginkan hadiah besar.