UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
Get 3DNow! Message Board
Team 3DNow! SETI
athlon times under 6hrs
profile | register | preferences | faq | search
|
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
|
Get 3DNow! Message Board Team 3DNow! SETI athlon times under 6hrs
|
| Author | Topic: athlon times under 6hrs |
| fredro Priest of Athlon |
 posted June 12, 2000 22:09  
has anyone done this yet? my650@702 came close 6hrs 3min IP: Logged |
| Armin High Priest of Athlon |
posted June 15, 2000 04:15
I ran a unit last night on the TBird 1000 and it took 6 hours 27 minutes. That, I think, is telling regarding the limitation through the RAM, since it is not a bit faster than the 900 or old 1000. IP: Logged |
| fredro Priest of Athlon |
posted June 15, 2000 07:48
thats very disapointing for seti, but thanks much for the info, you just saved me some $ IP: Logged |
| Intelman34 Wish I had an Athlon |
posted June 20, 2000 12:27
I just got a 6hrs 7min on my Athy running at 749mhz. That is under Win98SE. I cant believe I beat a t-bird. ------------------ IP: Logged |
| fredro Priest of Athlon |
posted June 20, 2000 03:36
excellent IP: Logged |
| Intelman34 Wish I had an Athlon |
posted June 25, 2000 23:05
I just got a 6hr 6min on the same system as above. Im getting closer  . Fredro... what OS do you have on your 702mhz system? Im gonna try to stable my system at 756mhz and maybe pull off a time under 6hrs...
------------------ [This message has been edited by Intelman34 (edited June 25, 2000).] IP: Logged |
| fredro Priest of Athlon |
posted June 26, 2000 02:56
intelman, just win98se. its a slave most of the time, but one heck of a quake3 computer. IP: Logged |
| VBall Wish I had an Athlon |
posted June 26, 2000 14:37
One result under 6 (5.952 to be precise) on my 800 MHz. That's using the SETI text version. Almost every other under 7 hrs as long as I play NO games whatsoever. IP: Logged |
| fredro Priest of Athlon |
posted June 26, 2000 23:15
thats great vball. do you mind giving your system specs? IP: Logged |
| Savine Follower of Athlon |
posted June 28, 2000 03:02
Fredo, Intel, do either of you mess with voltage in overclocking your Athlons? I get about one blue screen a day @bus 106 no voltage change on win98se. IP: Logged |
| fredro Priest of Athlon |
posted June 28, 2000 06:14
i`m running 1.7v i havent got any blue screens on my athlon ever. i do get a occasional lockup, about once a month, but it goes for weeks without a reboot also. [This message has been edited by fredro (edited June 28, 2000).] IP: Logged |
| Intelman34 Wish I had an Athlon |
posted June 29, 2000 12:20
I am Mr. UltraSuperPsycoOverclockerMan so to burn my Athy in i had it at 1.95v for a while. Now i have it sitting at 1.75v. It needs a little more because its a genuine 550mhz core (i didnt get lucky and get a 650) running at 749mhz. It also is my most stable system. My bus is at 107/214mhz and my multiplier is at 7 with 1/2 cache (374.5mhz). [This message has been edited by Intelman34 (edited June 29, 2000).] IP: Logged |
| sandorski Wish I had an Athlon |
posted July 28, 2000 08:09
Ooh, 7hr times and I was impressed recently when my times dropped from 24hr to 18-20hr times. In a couple weeks I hope to replace this k6-2 500 with a Duron 600@900. I hope to be joining the <7hr club soon!
------------------ IP: Logged |
| fredro Priest of Athlon |
posted July 28, 2000 17:03
let us know how that duron performs for you. some have said they outperform the classic athlon. IP: Logged |
| sNo Wish I had an Athlon |
posted July 29, 2000 18:11
you guys are lucky, i don't know why my board goes so slow.. i have an 800 mhz athlon and it takes me like 13 hours to complete a WU IP: Logged |
| fredro Priest of Athlon |
posted July 29, 2000 22:35
sno, are you running anything in the background, such as anti virus software? perhaps you are runing a screensaver? are you running the text version, or the gui? all of these have a impact on seti. IP: Logged |
| sNo Wish I had an Athlon |
posted August 03, 2000 20:57
i run absolutely nothing in the background and i don't run screensavers either.. i have the gui.. where would i get the text version for win98? IP: Logged |
| sNo Wish I had an Athlon |
posted August 03, 2000 21:00
or should i use the winnt text only version? IP: Logged |
| sNo Wish I had an Athlon |
posted August 03, 2000 21:01
or should i use the winnt text only version? IP: Logged |
| fredro Priest of Athlon |
posted August 04, 2000 03:19
yes run the win nt version. it should shave quite a bit of time. if i remember right, i think it is a hour faster on my athlon than the gui. IP: Logged |
| sNo Wish I had an Athlon |
posted August 04, 2000 15:47
i just ran into a problem while trying to install the winnt text version.. it gave me some stupid error message with a title or error starting program The C:\SETIATHOME-2.4.ALPHA-WINNT-CMDLINE.EXE file was not compiled for a cpu that is compatible with this version of Windows. Contact your vendor for a newer version the other box that comes up with that error box says Windows cannot run this program because it is an invalid format. So now what do i do? IP: Logged |
| wl6538 Follower of Athlon |
posted August 04, 2000 19:15
I think the version you got is for Alpha CPUs. Try to get hold of the "i386" version IP: Logged |
| sNo Wish I had an Athlon |
posted August 06, 2000 22:48
oops found it ya i had the alpha version IP: Logged |
| fredro Priest of Athlon |
posted August 07, 2000 21:39
i was reading version 3.0 is expected to be 40 to 50% slower than 2.4 seti`s server is so bogged down they had to do something, so if they slow the client down, lose a few thousand people, then they can keep up. use the excuse that they are digging deaper into the work unit, and most of the die hard seti crunchers fall for it. i myself will move on to a different project if my computers cannot crunch as fast as they currently are. IP: Logged |
| Armin High Priest of Athlon |
posted August 10, 2000 16:09
Well, sitting the fence of not wanting to discourage the SETI team, you'd all be more than welcome in defeating Poland on Gamma Flux and the follow-up projects at DCypher, as well as to participate in the upcoming paid projects at ProcessTree. IP: Logged |
| sandorski Wish I had an Athlon |
posted August 11, 2000 07:19
Can't you just use an older version? I only began using 2.04 of the Win9x client a month or so ago. Up until then I was using the previous version(I heard that 2.04 was slower). IP: Logged |
| sNo Wish I had an Athlon |
posted August 11, 2000 07:56
even though technically i'm not roaring up the list.. but to me i am.. and i'm loving since i finally got the text version finally hit 20 WU's .. i'm getting them done in about 7 hours sometimes less depending on what i'm doing.. IP: Logged |
| CASC member Follower of Athlon |
posted August 11, 2000 13:06
If SETI makes clients that are slower just for them to keep up i will not be putting forth as much of an effort as fredro has said. I am going to put out some gamma flux units for Armin as it would be nice to flatten Poland in the stats John IP: Logged |
| fredro Priest of Athlon |
posted August 12, 2000 02:08
we will just have to see what happens. maybe we will get lucky and still be able to use the old 2.0 and 2.4 versions. they said we couldnt use the 1.6 version when 2.0 came out, but just last week i downloaded a work unit for 1.6, although i didnt waste my cpu time on it.
IP: Logged |
| sandorski Wish I had an Athlon |
posted August 12, 2000 17:03
Update: I put together my Duron sys yesterday. It consists of a Duron650 and A7V and generic hs/fan(to be replaced by an Alpha 6035). I didn't go for the 600@900 deal, so I'll see what this 650 can do after the Alpha arrives(could be a month for stock to come in). The Duron is unlocked so that's good news. Anyway, so far at 650 I seem to be getting 10hr/wu results with the Win9x 2.04 client. I suppose I should try the NT client and see what happens. IP: Logged |
| Jayden Follower of Athlon |
posted August 12, 2000 19:55
I think this is the first time I have ever disagreed with any of you. When 3.0 comes out I will still crunch WU. I know many of you do this as a competition, but I am in it mostly for the possibility (how ever small) of finding a signal somewhere out there. I could care less if it takes one month per WU to crunch. If Berkeley says they want to “dig deeper” then I believe them. Yes, they could be lying, but I'm willing to take that chance. I also think that if they are going to "dig deeper" that they SHOULD use SSE and 3dnow. There are thousands of programmers that would be willing to help. Taking the BSD attitude and being a code snob doesn't help out the project any. If they are that overburdened then they should ask for help. The world will unite and give it to them. Ok...I'm off my soapbox now. IP: Logged |
| Franklin A. Childers Follower of Athlon |
posted August 12, 2000 22:46
I'm with you Jayden, It's a worthy project no matter the route. I'll be crunchin' em till the end. - Frank IP: Logged |
| All times are ET (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All submissions are copyrighted by their respective authors and are not for re-use in any form without their explicit written consent.
Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.37
© Madrona Park, Inc., 1998 - 1999.
Membaca review slot online bisa menjadi panduan yang sangat berguna. Review sering kali memberikan informasi tentang RTP slot tertinggi dan pengalaman pemain sebelumnya. Dengan memilih slot gacor yang telah direkomendasikan, peluang untuk menang dapat meningkat. Jadi, jangan lewatkan untuk memeriksa ulasan sebelum mulai bermain.